State v. Wright
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
This is an appeal by the state from an order granting a motion to suppress evi dence. The state contends that the trial court erred in concluding that there were no exigent circumstances which would have allowed the police officers to enter the defendant’s motel room. We agree.
The testimony of Officers Hernandez and Cochran of the Tucson Police Department was as follows. On December 12, 1978, Officers Hernandez and Cochran went to the Sun Valley Motel in Tucson, Arizona in response to a report of a disturbance. When they arrived they found two persons, Mr. Asaro and Mr.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Helen Frances Sutton Root v. Isabel H. GauperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- State v. DupuyArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. WintersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Collins v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. FisherArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- State v. SUPERIOR CT. OF STATE OF ARIZ., ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. PillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.