United States v. Neil Douglas Salisbury
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, Circuit Judge.
The 19-year-old defendant was convicted for failing to submit to induction and was sentenced under the Youth Corrections Act. He contends that his conviction should be reversed because the examining physician at his induction center did not closely observe him with clothing removed and, thus, failed to give him the full physical inspection required by the army’s own regulation, AR 601-270 § 4-21. The regulation provides in part:
“b. Scope of physical inspection. The examining physician will review the previous medical examination reports (SF 88 and 89) and any…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Welsh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Robert Nolen Briggs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Elliott Ashton Welsh, II v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. MendozaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1969
- United States v. Peter Ward PaceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States ex rel. Whitaker v. CallawayDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- United States v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1973