Legal Opinion
Edmiston v. City of Hobbs
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided June 17, 1997No. 17197Published
1Opinion of the Court
944 P.2d 883 (1997)
123 N.M. 654
1997-NMCA-085
Joyce EDMISTON, Worker-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF HOBBS and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Employer/Insurer-Appellees.
No. 17197.
Court of Appeals of New Mexico.
June 17, 1997.
Certiorari Denied August 27, 1997.
Lowell Stout, Stout & Stout, Hobbs, Sarah M. Singleton, Carolyn A. Wolf, Montgomery & Andrews, P.A., Santa Fe, for Worker-Appellant.
Kimberly A. Franklin, Hatch, Allen & Shepherd, P.A., Albuquerque, for Employer/Insurer-Appellees.
OPINION
BOSSON, Judge.
1. Worker Joyce Edmiston appeals a decision of the Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ). She argues that…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Reynolds v. Ruidoso Racing Association, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Ross v. Sayers Well Servicing CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Leo v. Cornucopia RestaurantNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Arellano v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- National Homeopathic Hospital Ass'n of District of Columbia v. Britton, Deputy Com'rCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.