Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hyatt v. Department of Labor & Industries

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 4, 2006No. 32256-1-IIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoughton, J.

¶1 — Fourteen workers’ compensation claimants appeal from a superior court order affirming a Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals (BIIA) decision either denying or limiting an adjustment of their time-loss compensation rate claims as calculated by the Department of Labor and Industries (L&I). We affirm.

FACTS

¶2 The 14 workers sustained industrial injuries and received employer-provided health care benefits, but those benefits ceased before L&I issued its time-loss compensation rate orders. In 12 of the claims (the 12 workers), L&I did not include the value of the workers’ health care .…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Marley v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crabb v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. Hyatt v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. Janice Brinson-Wagner v. Kennewick School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. Joseph C. Crabb v. Department Of Labor And IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API