Legal Opinion
Farmer v. Wilson Housing Authority
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided October 6, 2004No. 5:05-cv-00167PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DEVER, District Judge.
Jeffrey Thomas Farmer, proceeding pro se, claims that the Wilson Housing Authority (“WHA”) terminated his housing subsidy without due process. Farmer seeks reinstatement of his subsidy and $3,000 in punitive damages.
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c), defendant WHA has filed a motion for entry of judgment on the pleadings. For the following reasons, the court grants the motion and this action is dismissed.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Farmer is a participant in the WHA’s Section 8 rental voucher program. Answer ¶ A. In February 2005, Farmer rented an apartment in Carrboro, North…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Alexander v. City of GreensboroDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2011
- Mendenhall v. Hanesbrands, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2012
- Blue Rhino Global Sourcing, Inc. v. Well Traveled Imports, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2012
- Domtar AI Inc. v. J.D. Irving, Ltd.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2014
- Benn Godenzi v. CMD, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2025
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.