Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 3, 1907No. 418PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action on guardian’s bond, from city court of Floyd county— Judge Hamilton. February 20, 1907.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

Davis as ordinary of Floyd county brought suit for the use of Treadaway, guardian of the three named minor children of one Mark Smith, against the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, security on the bond of J. A. Carroll, deceased, guardian of said minor children. The jury found a verdict for the plaintiff; and to the judgment of the court, denying its motion for a new trial, error is assigned by the defendant. The case made by the plaintiff, briefly stated, is as follows: The appointment and qualification of J. A. Carroll as guardian of said three minor .children, November 15, 1899.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bailey v. McAlpinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Freeman v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Banister v. BagleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  2. Clark v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  3. Hawes v. Standard Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  4. National Surety Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  5. Jennings v. LonginoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API