Legal Opinion
HOBBS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR OF LABOR
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 30, 2025No. 3:22-cv-00956Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY TAMECA HOBBS, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 22-00956 (GC) (JTQ) v. OPINION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR OF LABOR, et al., Defendants. CASTNER, District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon two separate motions to dismiss pro se Plaintiff Tameca Hobbs’s Second Amended Complaint (SAC) (ECF No. 46). Defendant Scott A. Coffina, Esq., moved to dismiss the SAC under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (Rule) 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 53.) Defendants New Jersey Civil Service Commission (NJCSC), Mamta…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.