Legal Opinion

State Insurance Fund of Oklahoma v. Asarco Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 17, 1989No. 73450PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUGER, Justice.

The State Insurance Fund of the State of Oklahoma (Insurance Fund) filed suit in federal district court seeking recission and reimbursement under a workers’ compensation insurance policy issued to the defendant, Asarco Incorporated, d/b/a Federated Metals Corporation (Federated Metals). The Fund asserted that there had been fraud in the inducement of the policy, or, in the alternative, a mutual mistake of fact. 1 Questions dispositive of litigation pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma were certified to this Court on June 14, 1989,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Commercial Casualty Insurance v. HiltonTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. General Acc. Etc. Corp. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1925
  3. McDonald v. Time-DC, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. Brollier v. Van AlstineMissouri Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. Bankers Indemnity Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hefley v. Neely Insurance Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  2. Grennan v. Bonray DrillingCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. WIHO, L.L.C. v. HubbauerDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API