Legal Opinion

Graivier v. Dreger & McClelland

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 22, 2006No. A06A0093PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Chief Judge.

Dr. Miles Graivier, Kathy Graivier, and Dr. Graivier’s medical corporation, North Atlanta Plastic Reconstructive Surgery, PC. (“NAPRS”) (collectively, “the appellants”), sued attorney Richard Dreger and his law firm, Dreger & McClelland, for professional negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of an attorney employment contract. Dreger and his firm moved for summary judgment on all claims, and the trial court granted the motion. The Graiviers and NAPRS appeal the trial court’s ruling. For reasons that follow, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

Summary judgment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Berman v. RubinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Willett v. Russell M. Stookey, P.C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  3. Kushner v. McLartyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. Huntington v. FishmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  5. White v. RolleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Whiteside v. Decker, Hallman, Barber & Briggs, P.C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. Paul v. Smith, Gambrell & RussellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Young v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. Bonner Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. v. KarsmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API