Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Dissolution of the Marriage of Segree v. Segree

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided June 26, 2012No. Nos. 2011-CA-00330-COA, 2009-CA-00757-COAPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRussell, J.

II24. I agree with the majority’s decision to affirm the chancellor’s division of marital assets and the award of child support for Rebecca. However, I dissent regarding the majority’s decision to affirm the award of alimony to Susan. Additionally, I disagree with assumptions made by the majority regarding the current financial status of the parties, which were not a part of the chancellor’s decision or the appellate record before this Court. I find that the chancellor erred in awarding permanent periodic alimony to Susan because she was not left with a deficit. Therefore, I would reverse the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. FergusonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Armstrong v. ArmstrongMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Kilpatrick v. KilpatrickMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Henderson v. HendersonMississippi Supreme Court · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API