Legal Opinion

Kent v. Commissioner of Education

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 26, 1980PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaplan, J.

Procedural steps. The plaintiffs in these actions are children attending public schools in the towns of Framingham and Marblehead, and their parents; the defendants are the Commissioner of Education of the Commonwealth and the members of the school committees and superintendents of schools of Framingham and Marble-head. Filed in the Supreme Judicial Court for the county of Suffolk on February 6, 1980, the actions sought (i) declarations that the new so called “school prayer law” — G. L. c. 71, § 1A, inserted by St. 1979, c. 692, enacted on November 7, 1979, and becoming effective on February…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Abington School Dist. v. SchemppSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Engel v. VitaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Meek v. PittengerSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. ReganSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Opinions of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Taunton Eastern Little League v. City of TauntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. Policastro v. City of BostonMassachusetts Superior Court · 2005
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1989
  5. Opinion No. Oag 17-86, (1986), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API