Kent v. Commissioner of Education
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtKaplan, J.
Procedural steps. The plaintiffs in these actions are children attending public schools in the towns of Framingham and Marblehead, and their parents; the defendants are the Commissioner of Education of the Commonwealth and the members of the school committees and superintendents of schools of Framingham and Marble-head. Filed in the Supreme Judicial Court for the county of Suffolk on February 6, 1980, the actions sought (i) declarations that the new so called “school prayer law” — G. L. c. 71, § 1A, inserted by St. 1979, c. 692, enacted on November 7, 1979, and becoming effective on February…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abington School Dist. v. SchemppSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Engel v. VitaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Meek v. PittengerSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. ReganSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Opinions of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Taunton Eastern Little League v. City of TauntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Policastro v. City of BostonMassachusetts Superior Court · 2005
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1989
- Opinion No. Oag 17-86, (1986), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1986