Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Staples

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 8, 1939No. Appeal, 48PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadtfeld, J.,

This is an action of replevin instituted by the plaintiff, Henry A. Johnson, against Katie Engel and Elmer Staples to recover a Chevrolet automobile. Prior to the trial of the- case, the defendant, Katie Engel, died and a suggestion of death was filed substituting Elmer Staples and Jennie Staples, executors of the last will and testament of Katie Engel as party defendants in her stead.

The case was tried before Fare, P. J., specially presiding, and the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The defendants thereupon moved for a new trial and for judgment n.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ely v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis RailwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Delair v. McAdooSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Hostetler v. KniseleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Blossom Products Corp. v. National Underwear Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Danko v. Pittsburg Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. FlannerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Ingram v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Lusk v. Monongahela City Water Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Willetts v. Butler Twp. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Quantitative Financial Strategies Inc. v. Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API