Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Bugden Development Co. v. Kiefaber
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 8, 1960No. 2552PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCraweord, J.
This is an action in mandamus. The relator, a plat development firm, joined as respondents the Montgomery County Planning Commission, the Washington Township Board of Zoning Appeals, the township zoning inspector and the township trustees.
The prayer is for a writ of mandamus ordering respondents “to approve platting of lands of relator which conforms with areas of 15,000 square feet or more and set back of 50 feet as to 123 of said lots and of 40 feet as to 3 lots, provided in every other respect such platting complies with the law and regulations.”
From stipulations and the evidence, we…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cleveland Trust Co. v. Village of BrooklynOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
- State Ex Rel. Killeen Realty Co. v. East ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
- Davis v. McPhersonOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
- Meuser v. Smith, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1955
- State, Ex Rel. Cubbon v. WinterfeldOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ketchel v. Bainbridge TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Schreiner v. Russell Township Board of TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- State Ex Rel. River Grove Park, Inc. v. City of KetteringOhio Court of Appeals · 1962