Legal Opinion

Hall v. Hall

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 16, 1991No. 91-CA-269PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

588 So.2d 172 (1991)

Ethel HALL, Natural Tutrix of Danielle Hall

v.

Daniel HALL.

No. 91-CA-269.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit.

October 16, 1991.

Writ Denied January 6, 1992.

Ralph S. Whalen, Jr., New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

Before GRISBAUM and DUFRESNE, JJ., and ELORA C. FINK, J. Pro Tem.

GRISBAUM, Judge.

This is a paternity action. Pursuant to trial on the merits, the court found in favor of the plaintiff and granted a judgment of filiation. We affirm.

ISSUE

We are called upon to determine one primary issue:

Whether the record evidence suffices to prove, by a preponderance of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Broussard v. ColemanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Griffin v. SUCCESSION OF BRANCH EX REL. SMITHSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
  3. In Re WildeboerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Thomas v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Bricks Unlimited, Inc. v. StepterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Riser v. AMERICAN MEDICAL INTERN., INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. Gilchrist v. Ozone Spring Water Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Hall v. HallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Zarek v. SandersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API