Legal Opinion

Hall v. Hall

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 16, 1992No. 92-CA-548PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLIEBERT, Chief Judge.

This is a suspensive appeal perfected by Daniel Hall, the defendant-appellant, from a judgment dated April 28, 1992 in favor of Ethel Hall, Natural Tutrix of Danielle Hall, setting the amount of costs and attorney fees awarded to plaintiff in a judgment dated February 6, 1991. For the reasons which follow we affirm the trial court judgment.

On February 6, 1991 the trial court rendered judgment decreeing Daniel Hall to be the natural father of Danielle Hall, born to Ethel A. Flato, and ordered the defendant to pay “all costs of these proceedings including the fee and cost…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Arceneaux v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  3. Levy v. StellyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Hall v. HallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Tarver v. TarverLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cormier v. RobersonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Lieber v. Caddo Levee District Board of CommissionersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. England v. EnglandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API