Legal Opinion

Ayer Lord Tie Company v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided April 28, 1925PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge -Clay

Affirming.

Tills appeal challenges- the correctness of a judgment of the Jefferson circuit court declaring that certain crossties belonging to appellants and. on. hand at the plant of the Producers’ Wood Preserving Company in Jefferson county on June 30,1922, are taxable at the regular rate of $1.30 on each $100.00, and not at -the rate of 10 cents on each $100.00, the rale then in force for products in course of manufacture.

The agreed statement of facts is as follows:

“(1) Ayer & Lord Tie Company is a corporation, Bond Brothers is a corporation, and both…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Home Fire Insurance v. BarberNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Button v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Richmond & I. Const. Co. v. Richmond, N., I. & B. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  4. Exchange Bank v. Macon Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  5. Louisville Banking Co. v. EisenmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Morgan Clark v. MillsapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. United States v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
  3. Moorhead v. Curtis Pub. Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1942
  4. Todd County v. Bond Bros.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  5. Board of Tax Suprs. Etc. v. Baldwin Piano Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API