Daniel v. Atlanta Newspapers, Inc.

The court did not err in sustaining the demurrers to and in striking paragraphs 3 through 8 of the first amendment and in striking the last amendment. The only logical and reasonable interpretation that can be given to the comet's overruling of the general demurrer, in view of its striking the paragraphs of the amendment, is that the petition alleged a good cause of action as to whether or not the plaintiff was properly discharged without severance pay under the employment contract. This ruling restricted the issues to those of whether the plaintiff was guilty of drunkenness, and whether the…