Legal Opinion

Blount-Hudson Chevrolet Co. v. Blount

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 15, 1937No. 26216PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuerrt, J.

“The motion for new trial being based wholly on the general grounds as to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, and there being apparently no effort to brief the evidence in accordance with the requirements of the Civil Code, § 6093. [Code of 1933, § 70-305], (the paper filed as a brief of the evidence being apparently a full transcript of a stenographic report of the questions put to the witnesses and their answers), the judgment overruling the motion for new trial must be affirmed, under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court. *865Whitaker v. State, 138 Ga.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Price v. High & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Whitaker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. Whitaker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  4. Trueheart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  5. Carlisle v. RaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boston Insurance Co. v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. Daniel v. Atlanta Newspapers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  3. Gartrell v. TheoboldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API