Legal Opinion

Alamo Mills Co. v. Hercules Iron Works

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 7, 1892No. 48PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Bexar. Tried below before Hon. W. W. King.

1Opinion of the Court

COLLARD, Associate Justice.

The Hercules Iron Works, the appellee, brought this suit May 17,1889, against the Alamo Mills Company, now known as the Crystal Ice Manufacturing Company, and by an amended petition, filed January 10, 1890, alleged, that on the 26tli day of December, 1887, plaintiff entered into an agreement with defendant for the purpose of erecting an icé plant, consisting of two parts, with a daily capacity of forty tons of clear ice, to be produced from condensed steam, one half to be ready by March 1 and the other half to be ready by April 1, 1888, for which said Alamo Mills…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Griffin v. . ColverNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Morrison v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Jones v. GeorgeTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Houston & T. C. R'y Co. v. HillTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. J. H. Milliken & Co. v. Callahan CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Feeney & Bremer Co. v. StoneOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Connersville Wagon Co. v. McFarlan Carriage Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Walter Box Co. v. BlackburnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Graham Hotel Co. v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Board v. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API