Legal Opinion

Cathcart v. City of Columbia

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 29, 1933No. 13679PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Stabler.

The plaintiff, a citizen and taxpayer of the City of Columbia, instituted these proceedings in the original jurisdiction of the Court for the purpose of having declared unconstitutional two Acts, No. 366 and No. 465, passed by the legislature at its 1933 session.

The following is disclosed by the pleadings and agreed statement of facts: The City of Columbia desires and proposes to erect a municipal stadium, without its corporate limits, on lands to be donated for that purpose by certain interested citizens. For the accomplishment of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Winston v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Alabama State Bridge Corporation v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Lillard v. MeltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
  4. City of Joliet v. AlexanderIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  5. State Ex Rel. Richards v. MoorerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State and Diver v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Clarke v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  3. Elliott v. McNairSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  4. Hutcheson v. AthertonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Kelly v. Marylanders for Sports Sanity, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API