Legal Opinion

Quon Quon Poy v. Johnson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 21, 1927No. 68PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sanford

Quon Quon Poy, a Chinese boy fifteen years of age, arrived at the port of Boston in June, 1924, and applied for admission to the United States, claiming to be a foreign-bom son of Quon Mee Sing, a native-born citizen— whose citizenship was conceded — and, hence, under R. S. § 1993 1 (U. S. C., Tit. 8 § 6), to be himself a citizen of the United States. After a preliminary investigation by an inspector, his claim was heard, under the provisions of the Immigration Act of 1917, 2 by a Board of Special Inquiry, which decided, on the evidence, that he was not shown to be the son of Quon Mee Sing,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. United States v. Ju ToySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Chin Yow v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Bell v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Kwock Jan Fat v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Homefinders, Inc. v. City of EvanstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Padgett v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  4. Defense Supplies Corp. v. Lawrence Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Schoeps v. CarmichaelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API