Lewis v. . Mott

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The liability of the defendants to account to the plaintiff, would have been established if it had been shown that the transaction between their testator and How had placed him in the same relation to the debtor which How held. The complaint alleges that the whole interest How and Swift Hurlburt had in the two promissory notes and in the securities, was duly assignable, and had fully and effectually passed to him. This allegation is not as to the notes…