Legal Opinion

Marquet v. La Duke

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1893PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Menominee. (Stone, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

The defendant appeals -from a verdict and judgment rendered against him, in favor of a child of six years of age, who was bitten by a bear alleged to have been kept by defendant.

The following is a copy of the declaration:

“ Julian Narcisse Marquet, by his next friend, Narcisse Marquet, of the city of Menominee, in said county, plaintiff herein, by *597Sawyer & Waite, his attorneys, complains of Anton La Duke, defendant herein, of a plea of trespass on the case, filing this declaration, entering rule to plead, etc., as commencement of suit.
“For that whereas, the defendant above named, on October…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lepard v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Wegner v. HerkimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Indianapolis Abattoir Co. v. BaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. State v. Business Men's ClubMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Glave v. Michigan Terminix Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API