Freedman v. Meldy's, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
VANARTSDALEN, District Judge.
The complaint in this action has its genesis in an exclusive franchise agreement entered into between plaintiff and defendant, Meldy’s, Inc. Plaintiff seeks to recover losses sustained in the operation of a franchised restaurant, which enterprise he allegedly entered into as a result of certain misrepresentations made by defendants. Defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action and lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action will be granted.
Backgro…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Avon Hardware Co. v. Ace Hardware Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2013
- Layton v. AAMCO Transmissions, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1989
- St. Martin v. KFC Corp.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1996
- Olivieri v. McDonald's Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1988
- Brill v. Catfish Shaks of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.