Legal Opinion
Layton v. AAMCO Transmissions, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 25, 1989No. Civ. JFM-89-371PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MOTZ, District Judge.
This action arises out of a dispute concerning an AAMCO franchise. Plaintiffs are the franchisees, Robert and Sue Layton and Ste-Mar Inc., a corporation owned by the Laytons; the defendants are AAMCO Transmissions, Inc. and Robert Morgan and Abraham Bernstein, who were during the times relevant to this suit directors and, respectively, the chairman and president of AAMCO. Plaintiffs assert claims for common law fraud, violation of the Maryland Consumer Protection Act, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of an implied contractual duty of good faith and violation of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Finch v. Hughes Aircraft Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Al Vaughn, Marjorie Vaughn, Algon Corporation and Springfield Drive-Ins, Inc. v. General Foods Corporation and Burger Chef Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Picture Lake Campground, Inc. v. Holiday Inns, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1980
- Rita C. O'neal, Cross-Appellant v. Burger Chef Systems, Inc., and General Foods Corporation, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Dring v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2006
- Scotch Whisky Ass'n v. Majestic Distilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Pizza Management, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- La Quinta Corp. v. Heartland Properties LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Bond v. MessermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.