Legal Opinion

People v. Pullano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 14, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By pleading guilty, defendant forfeited his claim that the Grand Jury proceedings were defective because evidence obtained pursuant to an unlawful wiretap (see, People v Chiarenza, 185 AD2d 679 [decided herewith]; Peo*629ple v Candella, 171 AD2d 329) was presented to the Grand Jury (see, People v Kazmarick, 52 NY2d 322, 326).

We decline defendant’s request that we modify, in the interest of justice, the one-year imprisonment term imposed by the sentencing court. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J.—Conspiracy, 3rd Degree.) Present…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. KazmarickNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. CandellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. People v. ChiarenzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. ChiarenzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API