Legal Opinion

People v. Chiarenza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 14, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant, by entering an Alford plea to a reduced charge, forfeited his right to appellate review of his argument that the court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the indictment upon the ground that it was jurisdictionally defective because it was based on legally insufficient evidence pursuant to CPL 210.20 (1) (b) and 210.30 (see, People v Pelchat, 62 NY2d 97; People v Del Carpio, 166 AD2d 605, 606, lv denied 76 NY2d 1020; see also, People v Kazmarick, 52 NY2d 322, 326; People v Clairborne, 29 NY2d 950, 951; People v Pullano, 185 AD2d 628…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. PelchatNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. KazmarickNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. ClairborneNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. People v. AvantNew York Court of Appeals · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. BogueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. People v. AustinNew York Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. PullanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Anderson v. LeeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API