Lowe v. Jensen
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from the County Court of increased jurisdiction for Ward County; N. Davis, J. Action by S. H. Lowe and J. H. Hayes, doing business as S. H. Lowe & Company, against Martin L. Jensen. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtEisk, J.
Plaintiffs had judgment in the court below pursuant to a verdict directed by the court, and, from such judgment and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, this appeal is prosecuted.
Plaintiffs’ cause of action, as stated in the complaint, is upon an express contract to recover for certain labor and services- in threshing grain for defendant at the alleged special instance and request of such defendant. The answer consists of a general denial and other defensive matters unnecessary to state. At the trial plaintiffs were permitted, over defendant’s objections, to prove facts…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Manning v. School District No. 6Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Fordtran v. StowersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Hunt v. TuttleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Davis v. ChaseIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Ecker v. IsaacsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Schultz v. AndrusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Comptograph Co. v. Citizens BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Neugebauer v. AnstromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
- Yancey v. BoyceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. LoomisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.