Legal Opinion

Patrolman "X" v. City of Toledo

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 1999No. L-98-1174, Trial Court No. G-4801-CI-0199402884PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Melvin L. Resnick, Judge.

This is an appeal from two judgments of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas. Appellant, Patrolman X, appeals the trial court’s grants of summary judgment on some of his claims filed against appellees, the city of Toledo (“city”) and James W. Weigand, and the directed verdict on his remaining claims against the city only. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court’s judgments.

Patrolman X sets forth the following assignments of error:

“I. The trial court’s summary judgment ruling was an abuse of discretion and prejudicial error as contrary to law and against…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. HarveyOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Lentz v. City of ClevelandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
  3. Fleming v. Ashtabula Area City School Bd., 2006-A-0030 (4-18-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Lambert v. HartmannOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Piazza v. Cuyahoga Cnty.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API