Wisconsin Loan & Finance Corp. v. Goodnough
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed January 7, 1930:
RosenbeRry, C. J.
It was advisedly conceded upon the oral argument that the pleadings in this case are not a work of art. Upon the motion to set aside the judgment entered on cognovit the defendant offered a verified answer. After the judgment was vacated the answer so offered was apparently treated as the answer in the case. Thereupon the plaintiff filed a document denominated a reply. Under our system of pleadings there is no reply to an answer, the allegations of which are deemed denied. Sec. 263.26, Stats. It appears, however, that throughout…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- La Rosa ex rel. La Rosa v. NicholsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
- Grauman, Marx & Cline Co. v. KrienitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Lowery v. CateTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
- Tobin v. SpannSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Covault v. NevittWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Herget v. Circuit Court for Waukesha CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Kiefer v. Fred Howe Motors, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Byers v. Lemay Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- Drennen Motor Car Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Royal Finance Co. v. SchaeferMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.