Legal Opinion

Wisconsin Loan & Finance Corp. v. Goodnough

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1930PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed January 7, 1930:

RosenbeRry, C. J.

It was advisedly conceded upon the oral argument that the pleadings in this case are not a work of art. Upon the motion to set aside the judgment entered on cognovit the defendant offered a verified answer. After the judgment was vacated the answer so offered was apparently treated as the answer in the case. Thereupon the plaintiff filed a document denominated a reply. Under our system of pleadings there is no reply to an answer, the allegations of which are deemed denied. Sec. 263.26, Stats. It appears, however, that throughout…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. La Rosa ex rel. La Rosa v. NicholsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
  2. Grauman, Marx & Cline Co. v. KrienitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Lowery v. CateTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Tobin v. SpannSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  5. Covault v. NevittWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Herget v. Circuit Court for Waukesha CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Kiefer v. Fred Howe Motors, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Byers v. Lemay Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  4. Drennen Motor Car Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Royal Finance Co. v. SchaeferMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API