Legal Opinion

Royal Finance Co. v. Schaefer

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 15, 1959No. 30275PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DOERNER, Commissioner.

The theory upon which plaintiff seeks to recover a judgment in this case is that the defendants Joseph and Pat Schaefer fraudulently represented to plaintiff that defendant Joseph Schaefer was 22 years of age at the time they applied for and obtained a loan from plaintiff, when in fact he was still a minor; that they have repudiated their contractual obligation; and that plaintiff has been damaged by reason of said defendants’ fraud and deceit, for *130which it is entitled to recover. The action originated in the Magistrate Court of the City of St. Louis, which found for…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cox v. WrinkleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. Vermont Acceptance Corp. v. WiltshireSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
  3. Byers v. Lemay Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  4. Wisconsin Loan & Finance Corp. v. GoodnoughWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Kelley v. VandiverMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Merrick v. StephensMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API