Legal Opinion

Bowman v. State Roofing Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 18, 2005No. 25996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice MOORE:

Claimants Bowman and Gainey commenced these workers’ compensation claims alleging on-the-job injuries sustained on June 3 and September 15, 1998, while working for respondent State Roofing Company (Employer). Employer’s workers’ compensation insurance earner, appellant Travelers Insurance Company (Carrier), denied coverage on both claims asserting Employer’s policy had been cancelled effective before either claim arose. The two claims came before the single commissioner solely on the issue of coverage. The commissioner found the policy was not effectively cancelled and ordered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Government Employees Insurance v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  2. McElmurray v. American Fidelity Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  3. Hiott v. Guaranty National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  4. South Carolina Insurance v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Allstate Insurance v. ThatcherSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bowman v. State Roofing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  2. Burris v. PROPST LUMBER & LOGGING, INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  3. Rodeo, Inc. v. Columbia Casualty Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API