Legal Opinion

Bowman v. State Roofing Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 18, 2005No. 25996Published

1Opinion of the Court

365 S.C. 112 (2005)

616 S.E.2d 699

Bryan BOWMAN, Claimant,

v.

STATE ROOFING COMPANY, Chesterfield County School District, George Cantlon, Uninsured Employers' Fund, Travelers Insurance Co., AFCO Credit Corporation, and C. Douglas Wilson & Co. Inc.,

Of whom State Roofing Company and Uninsured Employers' Fund are Respondents, and

Travelers Insurance Co. and AFCO Credit Corporation are, Appellants.

Danny Gainey, Claimant,

v.

State Roofing Company, Chesterfield County School District, George Cantlon, Uninsured Employers' Fund, Travelers Insurance Co., AFCO Credit Corporation, and C. Douglas Wilson & Co.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Government Employees Insurance v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  2. McElmurray v. American Fidelity Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  3. Hiott v. Guaranty National InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  4. South Carolina Insurance v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Allstate Insurance v. ThatcherSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API