Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Harvell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 2, 1937No. 7 Div. 477PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

For the abatement of a liquor nuisance, the circuit solicitor filed proceedings in the equity court and obtained preliminary injunction against defendant J. H. Harvell. The hill also sought “padlock proceedings” against the premises, and the chancellor issued such an order as part of a preliminary injunction, and declined to permit defendant to reopen his premises for lawful purposes upon execution of a bond, a .course pursued in the decree here reviewed in Joiner v. State, 232 Ala. 522, 168 So. 885. And in Ex parte Hill, 229 Ala. 501, 158 So. 531, it was observed that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  2. Fulton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Ridge v. State Ex Rel. TateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Joiner v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Ex Parte TulleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barnett v. State Ex Rel. SimpsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Trans-Lux Corp. v. State Ex Rel. SweetonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Ex Parte Carroll v. FieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Ex Parte Hollingsworth v. FieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. Ex Parte Kadle v. FieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API