Legal Opinion

Board of County Commissioners v. Lane

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 8, 1907No. 14,939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Douglas district court; Charles A. Smart, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

Hannah Lane was a resident of Douglas county from 1898 to 1902. During that time she was the owner of certain mortgages which she did not include in her statements of taxable property made to the assessor, and upon which she paid no taxes. On . October 27, 1903, the county clerk, upon notice to her, undertook to charge her with a tax, on account of her ownership of such mortgages, for each of the years 1898, 1899, 1900, 1901, and 1902, the amounts being fixed by estimating the value by the usual methods and applying the rate for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hixon v. Oneida CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Day v. Town of PelicanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Pomeroy Coal Co. v. EmlenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  4. Topeka Water Supply Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Board of County Commissioners v. KaulSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  2. Lakeview Village, Inc. v. BOARD OF JOHNSON CTY. COMM'RSSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  3. State ex rel. Taggart v. HolcombSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. Sinclair v. EddySupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  5. State v. Magdalena Development Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API