Legal Opinion

Stricklen v. Pearson Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 14, 1918PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Pollc District Court. — C. A. Dudley, Judge. Action at law, to recover damages for personal injury. The material facts are stated in the opinion. There was a judgment for the defendant for costs, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

l. master and empiary damages, The defendant company was engaged in the construction of a building in the city of Des Moines, and, in the course of such work, excavated a hole or pit, in which to lay the foundation of a pier. The plaintiff, being then in the employ of the defendant, was by its foreman sent into the pit tq perform certain labor there; and while he was so engaged, the earth caved in upon him, causing him serious injury. Both parties had expressed their consent to the terms of the Workmen’s Compensation Act; and in *96compliance with the terms of said statute, plaintiff was awarded…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boardman v. Marshalltown Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. Connelly v. WhiteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Constantine v. RowlandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  4. White v. International Text Book Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  5. Myers v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. StevensonTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Kuiken v. GarrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  3. Sebastian v. WoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  4. Amos v. Prom, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1953
  5. Rhoads v. HeberlingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API