Constantine v. Rowland
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Johnson District Court. — Hon. R. P. Howell, Judge. Action oh an indemnifying bond for damages for the wrongful levy of an attachment. Trial and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, J.
The plaintiff in this action be'came the owner of a certain stock of goods consisting of fruit, confectionery, etc., by purchase from one Albert Gramas. At the time of the sale and transfer of said stock to the plaintiff, Gramas was indebted to the Lagomarcino Grupe Company and to several other dealers in his line. After the plaintiff had been in possession of the stock so purchased for some time, the defendant Lagomarcino Grupe Company brought suit against Gramas on their own claim, and on others that had been assigned to them, and sued out a writ of attachment, which was levied on the stock…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Spaids v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- North v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Vorse v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- Cousins v. Paxton & Gallagher Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Dalby v. CampbellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1888
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sebastian v. WoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
- Amos v. Prom, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1953
- Halligan v. Lone Tree Farmers ExchangeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- Stricklen v. Pearson Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- Gregory v. SorensonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.