Flowers v. City of Minneapolis
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COLLOTON, Circuit Judge.
Minnesota police officer Kevin Stoll appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity. Alfred Flowers sued Stoll under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging violations of several constitutional rights. The district court dismissed a number of claims, but concluded that Stoll was not entitled to qualified immunity with respect to Flowers’s allegations that Stoll violated his substantive due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. We conclude that the substantive due process claims should have been dismissed, and we therefore…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Zutz v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- McLean v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Thomas Winslow v. Richard SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Moore v. City of Desloge, Mo.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Marc Hall v. Ramsey CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.