Legal Opinion

Keabler v. City of Riverton

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1991No. 90-220PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MACY, Justice.

Appellants, twenty-two employees of Ap-pellee City of Riverton, appeal from an order granting the City’s motion for summary judgment after holding that the portion of the City’s personnel policies and procedures providing for employee insurance benefits was voidable by the City.

We affirm.

The employees raise the following issue:

1. The district court erred in holding that the employment contract as set forth in the personnel policies] and procedures of the Appellee/Defendant, City of Riverton[,] was voidable by the Appel-lee.

The parties agreed to the following stipulated…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mariano & Assoc., PC v. Board of County Com'rs of Sublette CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Michie v. Board of TrusteesWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Figuly v. City of DouglasDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1994
  3. Miech v. Sheridan County, WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Alfred J. Figuly v. The City of Douglas, a Municipal Corporation, H.R. Johnston, Individually, Ray Haskins, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. Matter of Estate of LoomisWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API