Legal Opinion

Hartsfield v. . Westbrook

Superior Court of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1796Published

1Opinion

A case similar to the present was decided at Edenton last term, Fosterv. Sandifer, ante, 237. The expression there was, "thence along the river"; here it is, "thence down the swamp to the beginning." They are both of the same import, and Foster v. Sandifer is therefore fit to govern the present, and accordingly the swamp in the present case is to be considered as the boundary. Let the nonsuit remain, and the rule to show cause why it should not be set aside, discharged.

Then General Davie dismissed the other suit of Hartsfield v. Fuller.

Cited: Rogers v. Mabe, 15 N.C. 194; McPhaul v. Gilchrist,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rowe v. Cape Fear Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Whitaker v. Cover.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. John Den on Dem. Rogers v. MabeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1833
  4. Tallassee Power Co. v. SavageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API