Legal Opinion
Aman v. Federal Express Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 4, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order *880unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of the liability of defendant and third-party plaintiff Federal Express Corporation (Fed Ex) under Labor Law § 240 (1). Contrary to Fed Ex’s contention, there are no unresolved material issues of fact concerning the proximate cause of the injuries of James R. Aman (plaintiff). The undisputed evidence establishes that plaintiff sustained his injuries by falling from a ladder while attempting…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Abramo v. Pepsi-Cola Buffalo Bottling Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Turner v. Eastman Kodak Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Connors v. Wilmorite, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by5 opinions
- McGuire v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Aman v. Federal Express Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Hann v. S&J Morrell, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Aman v. Federal Express Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Colyer v. K Mart Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000