Legal Opinion

Colyer v. K Mart Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 16, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

The court properly granted, however, that part of the motion of K Mart and Massa for summary judgment on their third-party claim for common-law indemnification. The right of common-law indemnification belongs to parties determined to be vicariously liable without proof of any negligence or active fault on their own part (see, Kemp v Lakelands Precast, 55 NY2d 1032, 1034; Kelly v Diesel Constr. Div., 35 NY2d 1, 5-7). As a matter of law, K Mart and Massa are such parties, given their demonstrated lack of supervision, direction or control over the work (see, Kemp v Lakelands Precast, supra, at…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rosado v. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Felker v. Corning Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Kelly v. Diesel Construction Division of Carl A. Morse, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Chapel v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Kemp v. Lakelands Precast, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API