Legal Opinion
Irazabal v. Paret
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 21, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2021-1378Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARIA DEL ROSARIO IRAZABAL, et. al, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-1378 201 KENNEDY STREET HOLDINGS, LLC, et al., Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (September 21, 2022) Plaintiffs Maria Del Rosario Irazabal (“Maria Irazabal”) and Julio Andres Irazabal (“Andres Irazabal”) allege that Charles Paxton Paret (“Paret”), Defendant 201 Kennedy Street Holdings, LLC (“201 Kennedy”), and Defendant Coloma River Holdings, LLC (“Coloma”) breached the terms of a Promissory Note (“Note”) agreement by failing to repay the loan’s…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm Beech David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm BeechCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Mwani, Odilla Mutaka v. Bin Ladin, UsamaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Jack Baker, Inc. v. Office Space Development Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Thuneibat v. Syrian Arab RepublicDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- District of Columbia v. Pierce Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.