Legal Opinion

State v. Peterson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 18, 1992No. M90-310; CA A73264PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.

This is an own motion determination of appealability in a criminal case. The issue is whether the trial court had jurisdiction to enter an amended judgment adding two new conditions of probation after the notice of appeal had been filed from the original judgment when there had been no violation of probation.

Defendant was convicted of assault in the fourth degree and given a one-year sentence of probation, subject to various conditions. After he had timely appealed from that judgment, the trial court entered an amended judgment containing new requirements that defendant reimburse the state…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BonnerOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. StuveCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. RickeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RiveraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Dean v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API