Legal Opinion

Ovist v. City of Hancock

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1983No. Docket 62222PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs sued the defendant for injuries plaintiff Robert Ovist received while repairing a portion of US-41 highway in the City of Hancock which had caved in due to a broken water line. The trial court granted the defendant a summary judgment based upon governmental immunity under MCL 691.1407; MSA 3.996(107) and MCL 250.61; MSA 9.901. Plaintiffs were granted leave to file a delayed appeal to this Court.

Plaintiffs first argue that the summary judgment was improper because they had pled facts showing the existence of a nuisance, which is an exception to governmental immunity. The nuisance…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rosario v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Gerzeski v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Ford v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Rubino v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pate v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Zyskowski v. HabelmannMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Ovist v. City of HancockMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Pate v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API