Legal Opinion

Ovist v. City of Hancock

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1983No. Docket 62222Published

1Opinion of the Court

123 Mich. App. 276 (1983)

333 N.W.2d 250

OVIST

v.

CITY OF HANCOCK

Docket No. 62222.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided February 10, 1983.

Wisti & Jaaskelainen, P.C. (by Michael E. Makinen), for plaintiff.

Vairo, Mechlin, Tomasi, Johnson & Manchester (by David R. Mechlin), for defendant.

Before: D.F. WALSH, P.J., and ALLEN and M.F. CAVANAGH, JJ.

2Per curiam

Plaintiffs sued the defendant for injuries plaintiff Robert Ovist received while repairing a portion of US-41 highway in the City of Hancock which had caved in due to a broken water line. The trial court granted the defendant a summary judgment based upon…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rosario v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Gerzeski v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Ford v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Rubino v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API