Legal Opinion

Meeker v. Reed

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 1924No. Docket No. 2921PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

W. J. Meeker, a duly qualified elector of the city of Santa Rosa, by this proceeding seeks the order of this court directing and commanding the respondent, C. L. Reed, as the city clerk of the city of Santa Rosa, a municipal corporation of the state of California, to call a special election for the purpose of electing three qualified persons to act as members of the city council of the said city of Santa Rosa.

The record in this case discloses the following: That the city of Santa Rosa is now and at all times mentioned in this proceeding was a municipal corporation organized and existing under…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Olmsted v. . DennisNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. State ex rel. Westfall v. BlairWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State ex rel. Neill v. PageMontana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Drescher v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kiddy v. Board of County Com'rs of Eddy CountyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  2. BARROW v. RAFFENSPERGER (Two Cases)Supreme Court of Georgia · 2020
  3. Klose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Cowles v. Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. Tooele County v. De La MareUtah Supreme Court · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API