Drescher v. Board of Supervisors
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
This is an application for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent Board of Supervisors to appoint a member of the Honcut-Yuba Irrigation District, upon the ground that there is a vacancy in the board of that district representing division one.
The application shows that the position is now being occupied by one C.F. Cox, who is performing the duties of the office with the acquiescence of his associates and under claim of right.
[1] Under the circumstances a writ of mandamus should not be issued because, in effect, it would require us to try the title to the office. The writ should not be…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kelly v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by3 opinions
- Klose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Meeker v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Jaramillo v. State Ex Rel. Board of County Com'rsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926