Legal Opinion

Drescher v. Board of Supervisors

California Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1923No. S. F. No. 10706PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an application for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent Board of Supervisors to appoint a member of the Honcut-Yuba Irrigation District, upon the ground that there is a vacancy in the board of that district representing division one.

The application shows that the position is now being occupied by one C.F. Cox, who is performing the duties of the office with the acquiescence of his associates and under claim of right.

[1] Under the circumstances a writ of mandamus should not be issued because, in effect, it would require us to try the title to the office. The writ should not be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kelly v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Klose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. Meeker v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Jaramillo v. State Ex Rel. Board of County Com'rsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API