Wiyott v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John I. Purtle, Justice.
Appellant appeals from his second offense conviction of driving while intoxicated by a jury in Crittenden County, Arkansas. He urges us to reverse his conviction because the trial court erred in allowing into evidence the appellant’s and his male companion’s state of dress (or undress) and because the evidence was insufficient to support the finding that he was in control of the vehicle. We find the state of dress was properly admitted and the evidence to be sufficient to sustain the conviction.
The police were called to the scene about 3:30 a.m. on October 13, 1983,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- Gruzen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Price v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Russell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Pitts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Azbill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Hodge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.