Legal Opinion
Fishman v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 13, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2021-1847Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JARED FISHMAN, Plaintiff V. Civil Case No. 21-1847 (RJL) THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, and LIEUTENANT PATRICK LOFTUS, OFFICER MARCK JAEGER, OFFICER JEREMY BRADY, OFFICER MICHAEL TONG, and OFFICER CHRISTOPHER TODARO, of the Metropolitan Police Department, Defendants Nee Nowe Nee Nee Nee Nee re Ne ee ee re ee Nee ee Nee” See” hy MEMORANDUM OPINION March (2 , 2025 [Dkt. ##47, 54] Before the Court are the parties’ motions for summary judgment, which revolve around the question of whether an initially valid Terry stop by a bevy of Metropolitan…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.